Articles
Business Law
- Owners of Video Copyrights Must Monitor the Internet
- Our Clients Ask Us: Dress Code
- Employment Litigation and the Discovery of Information on Social Networking Sites
- Illegal Immigrants in the Workplace
- New Legislation on Age Discrimination Law
- Our Clients Ask Us: Waiver of Right to Sue
- Criminal Trial in Absentia Against Corporation is Unlawful
- Small Public Companies to Begin Providing Audited Assessments
- The U.S. Census and Your Business
- Our Clients Ask Us: Unpaid Internships
- Law is Upheld Limiting Workplace Intentional Tort Lawsuits
- Health Care Reform: What Small Businesses Need to Know
- Our Clients Ask Us: PDAs
- 2010 Board of Revision Complaints
- The Most Wonderful Time of the Year: Limiting Liability at Office Holiday Parties
- Our Clients Ask Us: Grants
- Termination of Employee Post-Childbirth Ruled as Unlawful Sex Discrimination
- Business Condominiums: A More Common Type of Ownership
- Federal Red Flags Rule: Does it Apply to Your Business?
- 6% Interest Could be Heading Your Way
- Our Clients Ask Us: Credit Card/Payment Card Transactions
- Evidence of Oral Promises is Barred
- Act to Assist Workers Facing Mass Layoffs
- Associational Retaliation No Longer a Concern
- Our Clients Ask Us: Pregnancy Policy
- Statute of Frauds Requirement of a Signed Agreement is Upheld
- Ohio Focuses on Worker Misclassification
- New Bills Offers Pension Relief
- Our Clients Ask Us: Employee Termination
- The Ohio Tax Commission Lowers Interest Rate on Court Judgments
- Ohio's New Partnership Statute
- Privacy in the Workplace
- When is the Requirement of Written Contract Not Met?
- What's in a Name? Choosing Your Company Name
- The FDIC Extends IOLTA Unlimited Coverage
- The Age of the Digital Signature
- State Legislation That Could Affect Small Businesses
- Restoration of the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Privacy Laws
- Paying for Employee Travel Time
- Our Clients Ask Us: Jury Duty
- Our Clients Ask Us: Collections
- Ohio's Healty Families Act Could Leave Some Businesses Sick
- Issue 2 and Its Affect on Ohio Companies
- Identity Theft: A Guide for Ohio Victims
- Going Green at the Office
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
- Former Employee's Use of Memorized Client Information Violates Trade Secrets Act
- Federal Protection for Returning Veterans
- Entity Selection
- Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses
- Electronic Discovery Law
- Cuyahoga County's New Business Docket
- Copyright Licenses for Movie Nights
- Changes to Piercing the Corporate Veil
- Challenge to Ohio's EPA Plan
- Canton Repository- 10/1/06
- Business Succession Planning: The Basics
- Disposing of Confidential Information
Client Resources
Community Associations
- Member Lists: How to Properly Provide Information Requested
- Our Clients Ask Us: Stealing Association Utilities
- So the Board Wants to Amend the Documents, Now What?
- Top 10 Lessons Learned from MultiVest
- Ohio Planned Community Act: The Basics
- Ohio Planned Community Act Signed into Law
- To Self-Manage or Not to Self-Manage
- Our Clients Ask Us: Ignoring Member Complaints
- Ohio Case Law Update
- Discrimination Avoidance on Issues of Familial Status
- Helping Owners Understand the Necessity of Reserves
- Owner Grievances and Withholding Maintenance Fees
- Our Clients Ask Us: Owners Who Walk Away
- S.B. 187: Ohio Planned Community Act
- Change in the Economic Climate and Corresponding Change in Rental Restrictions
- Pet Restrictions: What is Considered Livestock?
- Inspections of Association Property and Liability Concerns
- Improper Rule or Regulation Pitfall
- The Right to Dry: The Next Attack on Association Regulations
- Our Clients Ask Us: Fence Installation
- Federal Red Flags Rule Update: Change in Effective Date
- Qualification for FHA Availibility
- Position as an Officer- What Does it Really Mean?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Leasing Units to Family Members
- Florida Association Driven to Bankruptcy
- Fair Housing: What Board Members Need to Know
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part V
- Ohio Planned Community Bill Introduced in Ohio Legislature
- Overrun by Renters!
- Our Clients Ask Us: Length of Foreclosure Process
- Exclusive Contracts Banned by FCC
- The Crisis Continues- Impact on New Condominiums
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part IV
- Federal Red Flags Rule: Does it apply to Community Associations?
- Here Kitty, Kitty: Whose Cat is That?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Repair Reimbursement
- Victory for Association's Architectural Restrictions
- Curfews in Associations
- Methods for Keeping the Peace-- Part III
- The Beginning of a New Era: Developer Foreclosures and Builder Foreclosures
- Federal Programs to Aide Homeowners
- Our Clients Ask Us: Tenants on Board?
- Volatile Enforcement Hearings
- Declaration and Bylaws vs. Rules and Regulations-- What's What
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part II
- Accepting an Assessment Increase
- What Happens When a Member Files for Bankruptcy
- EXCLUSIVE USE AREA REPAIR-WHOSE PROBLEM IS IT?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Additions
- Methods for Keeping the Peace (1)
- Proper Use of Reserve Funding
- Recent Ohio Court Ruling: Arbitration Procedures
- Our Clients Ask Us: Partial Payments
- Our Clients Ask Us- Maintenance/ Service Contracts
- Our Clients Ask Us- Pool Membership
- Coping with Budgetary Challenges
- National Trends in Budget Management
- New Requirement for Fannie Mae Backed Loans
- Suspension of Privileges in Response to Non-Payment
- Our Clients Ask Us: Keys to Units
- Assisting Elderly Association Members
- From Community Newsletter to Defamation Lawsuit
- Superlien Legislation: Is Ohio Next?
- Our Clients Ask Us- Fuel Surcharges
- Are You Covered? D & O Insurance Explained
- Denial of Architectural Requests: Avoiding Litigation
- HR Act 3221: The Housing & Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HOPE Fund)
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Members Feeding Wildlife
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Picnic/ Party
- Smoking Bans- Can They Apply to a Unit?
- Our Clients Ask Us- Satellite Dishes
- Our Clients Ask Us- Open Board Meetings
- Our Clients Ask Us- Delinquent Members
- Our Clients Ask Us- Water Damage
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Pools
- Strategies for Reduction of Legal Costs
- Smart E-mails: Avoiding Use of the Technology
- Effect of New Underwriting Guidelines for Home Loans
- The Business Judgment Rule: Protecting Board Decisions
- Smoking Bans- Can They Apply to a Unit?
- When is Patriotism Allowed? Displaying the American Flag
- Association Attorneys: The Mystery of Who We Represent
- Discussion of Association Issues Over E-mail
- Protecting Association Assets
- Developing a "Community" Through Fostering Relationships
- Defacing Common Elements: Catching a Graffiti Artist
- Prison Time for Kathleen DeSalvo
- Pet Restrictions
- Guidelines for Selecting a Reserve Professional
- Going Green: Making the Association Earth-Friendly
- Pool Safety Receives Congressional Attention
- Corporate Ownership of Units in the Community
- Rule Enforcement: Is Some Discretion Allowed?
- Political Signs: Free Speech or Rule Violation?
- The Mortgage Crisis: Foreclosure Rates Affect Associations
- Tax Relief For Common Elements
- Representing The Condominium Purchaser
- Practical Pointers In Ohio Condominium Law
- Condominium Loans
- Legal Audit Checklist
- Condominium Insurance Seminar
- Handling Condominium Disputes
- Condominium Defects
- Analysis Of Ohio's Condominium Act Amendments
- Ban on Exclusive Cable Deals by the FCC
Cyber Law
Estate Planning
In the News
- Legislator: Bill would provide Ohio condo associations with more financial flexibility (from The Daily Reporter, Columbus, OH)
- MultiVest Clients Look to Rebound, Recover Money- Cleveland.com- 3/2/07
- Home and Condo Associations Missing "Millions"-Cleveland.com-2/20/07
- Dueling Associations in Lengthy Litigation Over Causeway-Columbus
- Ohio Island Homeowners Association Snarled in Legal Fights- ABC 13 Toledo- 10/2/06
- Johnson Island Toll Halted- Toledo Blade- 6/8/06
Real Estate Law
Restoration of the Americans with Disabilities Act
In June of this year, the House of Representatives passed an amended version of the ADA (Americans with Disability Act) Restoration Act. This amended version radically expands the reach and scope of the ADA. The Restoration Act modifies the meaning of the term “disabled” to include a broader class of Americans. This new classification would impose heavier restrictions on employers.
Under the current law, the ADA covers those with “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.” The new Act retains the definition but redefines the term “major life activity” to include an expansive list of activities. The definitional change and list of major life activities is intended to restore coverage for many groups who have been interpreted by the courts to not be disabled under the ADA.
The Act further mandates that the meaning of the term “disability” be construed broadly in every possible way. The Act would redefine “disability” to be any actual, past or perceived physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. Under this new definition, even impairments that are episodic or in remission, if those impairments would substantially limit a major life activity when active, are considered disabilities. The Act would also cover employees who have impairments that are routinely corrected with medication and other aids. The Act does however leave an exception for ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses and states that the effects of eyeglasses and contact lenses shall be considered when determining whether an individual is disabled.
The Act also significantly changes the definition of “regarded as” disabled. Under the current law, an individual may be regarded as disabled if the individual establishes that he or she has been subjected to a discriminatory act because of a perceived disability that would substantially limit one or more major life activities. Under the revised Act, a person will be “regarded as” disabled even if the perceived impairment would not limit a major life activity. Basically, in order to be deemed “disabled” an individual need only prove that he or she has a physical or mental impairment and that he or she was discriminated against because of it. There is no requirement that the impairment, whether perceived or real, would substantially limit one or more major life activities.
Under the ADA, businesses with more than 15 employees must make “reasonable accommodations” in their hiring processes, workplace environments, and job duties to allow disabled employees to work. Reasonable accommodations are those that do not impose “undue hardship” on the employer and generally consist of shifting job tasks to other employees, altering when and how job tasks are performed, or providing a disabled employee with unlimited leave that does not result in termination. Some common accommodations that rarely impose an undue hardship include installing ramps and accessible restrooms, hiring interpreters for the deaf or blind, and soundproofing portions of the workplace.
If a disability prevents an employee from performing his or her duties entirely, the employer must reassign the employee to any vacant position of similar pay and status for which he or she is qualified. At the same time, an employer may not disclose to other employees that any of these changes are being made to accommodate a disability; such a disclosure of “medical information” is a violation of the ADA.
Though these accommodations usually do not pose a problem to a big business, they could become burdensome and costly to a small business that does not have the structures in place to make these accommodations in a relatively efficient manner. As an employer it is important to be aware of the possible effects of the ADA Restoration Act and to act accordingly when making business and employment decisions.