Articles
Business Law
- Owners of Video Copyrights Must Monitor the Internet
- Our Clients Ask Us: Dress Code
- Employment Litigation and the Discovery of Information on Social Networking Sites
- Illegal Immigrants in the Workplace
- New Legislation on Age Discrimination Law
- Our Clients Ask Us: Waiver of Right to Sue
- Criminal Trial in Absentia Against Corporation is Unlawful
- Small Public Companies to Begin Providing Audited Assessments
- The U.S. Census and Your Business
- Our Clients Ask Us: Unpaid Internships
- Law is Upheld Limiting Workplace Intentional Tort Lawsuits
- Health Care Reform: What Small Businesses Need to Know
- Our Clients Ask Us: PDAs
- 2010 Board of Revision Complaints
- The Most Wonderful Time of the Year: Limiting Liability at Office Holiday Parties
- Our Clients Ask Us: Grants
- Termination of Employee Post-Childbirth Ruled as Unlawful Sex Discrimination
- Business Condominiums: A More Common Type of Ownership
- Federal Red Flags Rule: Does it Apply to Your Business?
- 6% Interest Could be Heading Your Way
- Our Clients Ask Us: Credit Card/Payment Card Transactions
- Evidence of Oral Promises is Barred
- Act to Assist Workers Facing Mass Layoffs
- Associational Retaliation No Longer a Concern
- Our Clients Ask Us: Pregnancy Policy
- Statute of Frauds Requirement of a Signed Agreement is Upheld
- Ohio Focuses on Worker Misclassification
- New Bills Offers Pension Relief
- Our Clients Ask Us: Employee Termination
- The Ohio Tax Commission Lowers Interest Rate on Court Judgments
- Ohio's New Partnership Statute
- Privacy in the Workplace
- When is the Requirement of Written Contract Not Met?
- What's in a Name? Choosing Your Company Name
- The FDIC Extends IOLTA Unlimited Coverage
- The Age of the Digital Signature
- State Legislation That Could Affect Small Businesses
- Restoration of the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Privacy Laws
- Paying for Employee Travel Time
- Our Clients Ask Us: Jury Duty
- Our Clients Ask Us: Collections
- Ohio's Healty Families Act Could Leave Some Businesses Sick
- Issue 2 and Its Affect on Ohio Companies
- Identity Theft: A Guide for Ohio Victims
- Going Green at the Office
- Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008
- Former Employee's Use of Memorized Client Information Violates Trade Secrets Act
- Federal Protection for Returning Veterans
- Entity Selection
- Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses
- Electronic Discovery Law
- Cuyahoga County's New Business Docket
- Copyright Licenses for Movie Nights
- Changes to Piercing the Corporate Veil
- Challenge to Ohio's EPA Plan
- Canton Repository- 10/1/06
- Business Succession Planning: The Basics
- Disposing of Confidential Information
Client Resources
Community Associations
- Member Lists: How to Properly Provide Information Requested
- Our Clients Ask Us: Stealing Association Utilities
- So the Board Wants to Amend the Documents, Now What?
- Top 10 Lessons Learned from MultiVest
- Ohio Planned Community Act: The Basics
- Ohio Planned Community Act Signed into Law
- To Self-Manage or Not to Self-Manage
- Our Clients Ask Us: Ignoring Member Complaints
- Ohio Case Law Update
- Discrimination Avoidance on Issues of Familial Status
- Helping Owners Understand the Necessity of Reserves
- Owner Grievances and Withholding Maintenance Fees
- Our Clients Ask Us: Owners Who Walk Away
- S.B. 187: Ohio Planned Community Act
- Change in the Economic Climate and Corresponding Change in Rental Restrictions
- Pet Restrictions: What is Considered Livestock?
- Inspections of Association Property and Liability Concerns
- Improper Rule or Regulation Pitfall
- The Right to Dry: The Next Attack on Association Regulations
- Our Clients Ask Us: Fence Installation
- Federal Red Flags Rule Update: Change in Effective Date
- Qualification for FHA Availibility
- Position as an Officer- What Does it Really Mean?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Leasing Units to Family Members
- Florida Association Driven to Bankruptcy
- Fair Housing: What Board Members Need to Know
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part V
- Ohio Planned Community Bill Introduced in Ohio Legislature
- Overrun by Renters!
- Our Clients Ask Us: Length of Foreclosure Process
- Exclusive Contracts Banned by FCC
- The Crisis Continues- Impact on New Condominiums
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part IV
- Federal Red Flags Rule: Does it apply to Community Associations?
- Here Kitty, Kitty: Whose Cat is That?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Repair Reimbursement
- Victory for Association's Architectural Restrictions
- Curfews in Associations
- Methods for Keeping the Peace-- Part III
- The Beginning of a New Era: Developer Foreclosures and Builder Foreclosures
- Federal Programs to Aide Homeowners
- Our Clients Ask Us: Tenants on Board?
- Volatile Enforcement Hearings
- Declaration and Bylaws vs. Rules and Regulations-- What's What
- Methods for Keeping the Peace- Part II
- Accepting an Assessment Increase
- What Happens When a Member Files for Bankruptcy
- EXCLUSIVE USE AREA REPAIR-WHOSE PROBLEM IS IT?
- Our Clients Ask Us: Additions
- Methods for Keeping the Peace (1)
- Proper Use of Reserve Funding
- Recent Ohio Court Ruling: Arbitration Procedures
- Our Clients Ask Us: Partial Payments
- Our Clients Ask Us- Maintenance/ Service Contracts
- Our Clients Ask Us- Pool Membership
- Coping with Budgetary Challenges
- National Trends in Budget Management
- New Requirement for Fannie Mae Backed Loans
- Suspension of Privileges in Response to Non-Payment
- Our Clients Ask Us: Keys to Units
- Assisting Elderly Association Members
- From Community Newsletter to Defamation Lawsuit
- Superlien Legislation: Is Ohio Next?
- Our Clients Ask Us- Fuel Surcharges
- Are You Covered? D & O Insurance Explained
- Denial of Architectural Requests: Avoiding Litigation
- HR Act 3221: The Housing & Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HOPE Fund)
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Members Feeding Wildlife
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Picnic/ Party
- Smoking Bans- Can They Apply to a Unit?
- Our Clients Ask Us- Satellite Dishes
- Our Clients Ask Us- Open Board Meetings
- Our Clients Ask Us- Delinquent Members
- Our Clients Ask Us- Water Damage
- Our Clients Ask Us- Association Pools
- Strategies for Reduction of Legal Costs
- Smart E-mails: Avoiding Use of the Technology
- Effect of New Underwriting Guidelines for Home Loans
- The Business Judgment Rule: Protecting Board Decisions
- Smoking Bans- Can They Apply to a Unit?
- When is Patriotism Allowed? Displaying the American Flag
- Association Attorneys: The Mystery of Who We Represent
- Discussion of Association Issues Over E-mail
- Protecting Association Assets
- Developing a "Community" Through Fostering Relationships
- Defacing Common Elements: Catching a Graffiti Artist
- Prison Time for Kathleen DeSalvo
- Pet Restrictions
- Guidelines for Selecting a Reserve Professional
- Going Green: Making the Association Earth-Friendly
- Pool Safety Receives Congressional Attention
- Corporate Ownership of Units in the Community
- Rule Enforcement: Is Some Discretion Allowed?
- Political Signs: Free Speech or Rule Violation?
- The Mortgage Crisis: Foreclosure Rates Affect Associations
- Tax Relief For Common Elements
- Representing The Condominium Purchaser
- Practical Pointers In Ohio Condominium Law
- Condominium Loans
- Legal Audit Checklist
- Condominium Insurance Seminar
- Handling Condominium Disputes
- Condominium Defects
- Analysis Of Ohio's Condominium Act Amendments
- Ban on Exclusive Cable Deals by the FCC
Cyber Law
Estate Planning
In the News
- Legislator: Bill would provide Ohio condo associations with more financial flexibility (from The Daily Reporter, Columbus, OH)
- MultiVest Clients Look to Rebound, Recover Money- Cleveland.com- 3/2/07
- Home and Condo Associations Missing "Millions"-Cleveland.com-2/20/07
- Dueling Associations in Lengthy Litigation Over Causeway-Columbus
- Ohio Island Homeowners Association Snarled in Legal Fights- ABC 13 Toledo- 10/2/06
- Johnson Island Toll Halted- Toledo Blade- 6/8/06
Real Estate Law
Ohio’s New Partnership Statute
A new statute, modeled after the Revised Uniform Partnership Act of 1997 (RUPA) and codified as chapter 1776 of the Ohio Revised Code, governs any new Ohio general partnerships formed since the beginning of this year. The new statute resolves the uncertainty of the previous partnership statute by setting explicit rules and acting as a default for matters that are not covered in the partnership agreement. Furthermore, it provides mandatory rules that override conflicting provisions in the partnership agreement.
Starting January 1, 2010, the new statute will cover not only newly formed partnerships, but also previously formed partnership. However, existing partnerships do have the option to be governed by the new statute prior to the 2010 date.
The sponsor of Bill that adopted the Act, Senator Mark Wagoner, stated that the legislation “streamlines the fundamentals of partnership law to reflect modern business practices” through five principle goals. Sen. Wagoner, House Civil and Commercial Law (First Hearing, Oct. 17, 2007). The five principal goals are:
1. To create a more flexible structure for Ohio partnerships;
2. To allow partners to change partnership rules by agreement under certain basic standards set forth in the Act;
3. To classify a partnership as an entity, not as an aggregate of separate persons;
4. To spell out the clear authority for property transfers; and
5. To change the law on dissolution and continuity of partnerships.
In order to achieve the first two principal goals, the statute now allows partners to define their relationships to each other and to the partnership itself in the partnership agreement.
With regard to the third principal goal, the provision is intended to put Ohio’s partnership law more in alignment with RUPA. As an entity separate from the individual partners, the partnership has the capacity to sue and be sued in its own name. Also, as an entity, the partnership owns the partnership property. The partners do not personally own the partnership property.
The statute also sets forth rules for the transfer of partnership property. The statute provides that an instrument executed by the person that currently “holds” the property may transfer property of the partnership. This applies to partnership property “held” either in the name of the partnership, one or more partners, or by a non-partner.
The fifth principal goal is to change the law on dissolution and continuity of partnerships.
A partnership-at-will may be dissolved upon any partner’s notice of dissociation. Partnerships for a definite term or a particular undertaking will dissolve (1) within 90 days of the death of a partner or the wrongful dissociation or the agreement of half of the partners to dissolve; (2) upon unanimous consent of the partners; (3) the term has expired or the undertaking is complete; (4) if it is unlawful for the business of the partnership to continue; and (5) by court order under certain circumstances.
When a partnership is intended to continue until the happening of an event or for a specific duration, it is not automatically dissolved upon the occurrence of the event or time limit. Instead, the partnership continues as a partnership-at-will until the occurrence of a dissolution event. The partnership
will even continue beyond the dissolution event in order to wind up the partnership’s affairs. The partnership is terminated only when its business is completed.
The partnership can continue, however, if a partner dissociates from the partnership. Any partner may dissociate from a partnership-at-will by either giving notice to the partnership or on the occurrence of an agreed event. Under certain conditions, a partner may be dissociated by unanimous vote of the partners or by court order.
Although partnerships are recommended less frequently than other entities for new businesses, it is important to be aware of the changes if you are involved in a partnership or are thinking of forming a business entity.